Hi Ian, All, Given the information below, I think it would be useful to move this spec to a "test-ready" state. That is, publish it as a Last Call Working Draft now and if there are known issues, document them in the Status of the Document Section. Then, after a fixed review period, if no substantial changes are agreed, the spec can be moved to Candidate Recommendation and work on a test suite can begin. Naturally, if major changes are agreed, the spec will need to return to Working Draft. Are there any objections to doing the above? -Art Barstow On Feb/14/2011 5:18 AM, ext Ian Hickson wrote: > On Sat, 12 Feb 2011, Arthur Barstow wrote: >> Regarding re-publishing the Web Workers spec [ED] as a new Last Call >> Working Draft ... >> >> Bugzilla shows one open bug [Bugs]: >> >> 11818 - As documented in the "Creating workers" section, a worker *must* be >> an external script. >> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11818 >> >> What high priority work must be done such that this spec is ready to be >> re-published as a new Last Call Working draft? > None, to my knowledge. The bug above is a feature request. > > >> In particular, what are the proposals, plans and timeline to address the >> above bug? > I expect to address the issue of supporting data: URL scripts in workers > at the same time as adding the ability to do cross-origin shared workers, > currently estimated to be in 6 to 18 months, depending on browser > implementation progress on other features in the same timeframe. > > HTH,Received on Thursday, 24 February 2011 20:23:39 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:13:16 UTC