- From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
- Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 18:37:05 +0000
- To: Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com>
- CC: "Nilsson, Claes1" <Claes1.Nilsson@sonyericsson.com>, "Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com" <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>, "public-device-apis@w3.org" <public-device-apis@w3.org>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, Peter Dekkers <peter@jbaron.com>, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>, Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>
Nathan wrote: > Marcos Caceres wrote: >> On 9/16/10 6:10 PM, Nathan wrote: >>> Marcos Caceres wrote: >>>> As above. I thought that was what we (Web Apps WG - Widgets) have been >>>> doing for the last 5 years? >>> >>> Maybe I've missed part of the specifications - are you telling me that I >>> can package up an HTML,CSS,JS based application as per the widgets >>> specification, include a WARP, Digital Signature, set the view-mode to >>> windowed and that this will run as is, in the main browser context of >>> the main browser vendors (Firefox, Safari, Opera, Chrome, IE etc)? >> >> Ah! ok. I get it now. No, that won't work right now (actually, that's >> how we run them in our development environment for testing purposes :) >> ). But that is trivial and no one has really asked for that. > > Good to know, and you can consider me as asking for it! > >> I'm still a bit lost as to what the use case is? following up, see "Web Apps -- requirements for installation and management" from TimBL: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2011Feb/0078.html Best, Nathan
Received on Tuesday, 8 February 2011 18:39:00 UTC