Nathan wrote: > Marcos Caceres wrote: >> On 9/16/10 6:10 PM, Nathan wrote: >>> Marcos Caceres wrote: >>>> As above. I thought that was what we (Web Apps WG - Widgets) have been >>>> doing for the last 5 years? >>> >>> Maybe I've missed part of the specifications - are you telling me that I >>> can package up an HTML,CSS,JS based application as per the widgets >>> specification, include a WARP, Digital Signature, set the view-mode to >>> windowed and that this will run as is, in the main browser context of >>> the main browser vendors (Firefox, Safari, Opera, Chrome, IE etc)? >> >> Ah! ok. I get it now. No, that won't work right now (actually, that's >> how we run them in our development environment for testing purposes :) >> ). But that is trivial and no one has really asked for that. > > Good to know, and you can consider me as asking for it! > >> I'm still a bit lost as to what the use case is? following up, see "Web Apps -- requirements for installation and management" from TimBL: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2011Feb/0078.html Best, NathanReceived on Tuesday, 8 February 2011 18:39:00 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:13:16 UTC