- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 02:52:42 -0800
- To: Joćo Eiras <joao.eiras@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 2:45 AM, Joćo Eiras <joao.eiras@gmail.com> wrote: >> The only solution I can think of is to require (or recommend) that >> implementations run the garbage collector in a context after firing >> the "versionchange" event if the database still isn't closed. This >> should be a rare occurrence simply because setVersion should be rare. > > That would be a hack in the implementation and a hack in the spec. Why? And what are you suggesting instead? The above email is very hard to act on. / Jonas
Received on Tuesday, 8 February 2011 10:53:36 UTC