- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 16:17:53 -0500
- To: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- CC: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, "ext Klotz, Leigh" <Leigh.Klotz@Xerox.com>, Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@google.com>
- Message-ID: <4D794001.9050303@nokia.com>
All - Daniel Glazman responded to this subject on a Member-only list and he gave me permission to fwd his response to this list: [[ My personal take about it is that the HTML-based component model proposed by Google is not desirable. It's an HTML-browser centric solution that will require from non-HTML user agents to have knowledge of the HTML namespace. Furthermore, it's in my opinion a rather unbalanced proposal, trying to integrate things into HTML to "make things simpler" but adding too much complexity to make them really simple. I'd rather stick to an XML-based solution or, to allow the search of a compromise, establish the list of requirements first and then decide on the format and dialect. </Daniel> ]] On Mar/9/2011 9:14 AM, ext Arthur Barstow wrote: > Ian, Leigh, Dimitri, All, > > On March 11, the agenda of the so-called Hypertext Coordination Group > [HCG] will include XBL [XBL] to continue related discussions they had > during their Feb 11 call [Feb-11-Mins]. I wasn't present at that call > but based on those meeting minutes and what Leigh said last month > [Leigh], I think the gist of the March 11 discussion will revolve around: > > * What is the latest implementation status of the XBL2 CR [XBL2-CR] > and Hixie's September 2010 version [XBL-ED] (previously referred to as > "XBL2-cutdown")? > > * Which members of WebApps want to continue with the XML-based version > of XBL2 as codified in the XBL2 CR? If you are groupin this , what > firm commitments can you make to push the spec along the REC track? > Would you object to the Forms WG taking over this spec? > > * Which members of WebApps want to continue with the non-XML version > as Hixie created last September? If you are in this group, what firm > commitments can you make to push this version along the REC track > (especially implementation)? > > * Should the WG pursue Dimitri Glazkov's Component Model proposal > [Component]? If yes, who is willing to commit to work on that spec? > > Please send comments on the above as soon as possible (preferably > before 10:00am Boston time on March 11). > > -Art Barstow > > [XBL] http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/XBL > [HCG] http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/CoordGroup/ > [Feb-11-Mins] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-hypertext-cg/2011JanMar/0007.html > [Leigh] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011JanMar/0243.html > [XBL2-CR] http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/CR-xbl-20070316/ > [XBL2-ED] http://dev.w3.org/2006/xbl2/ > [Component] http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/Component_Model_Use_Cases > > >
Received on Thursday, 10 March 2011 21:18:32 UTC