Allow access only from serialized callbacks in workers. Cheers Keean On 11 Jan 2011 14:45, "Jeremy Orlow" <jorlow@chromium.org> wrote: > So what's the plan for localStorage in workers? > > J > > On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 9:10 AM, Keean Schupke <keean@fry-it.com> wrote: > >> I think I already came to the same conclusion... JavaScript has no control >> over effects, which devalues STM. In the absence of effect control, apparent >> serialisation (of transactions) is the best you can do. >> >> What we need is a purely functional JavaScript, it makes threading so much >> easier ;-) >> >> >> Cheers, >> Keean. >> >> >> On 10 January 2011 23:42, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org> wrote: >> >>> STM is not a panacea. Read >>> http://www.bluebytesoftware.com/blog/2010/01/03/ABriefRetrospectiveOnTransactionalMemory.aspxifyou haven't already. >>> >>> In Haskell, where you have powerful control over effects, it may work >>> well, but Javascript isn't anything like that. >>> >>> Rob >>> -- >>> "Now the Bereans were of more noble character than the Thessalonians, for >>> they received the message with great eagerness and examined the Scriptures >>> every day to see if what Paul said was true." [Acts 17:11] >>> >> >>
Received on Tuesday, 11 January 2011 18:31:57 UTC