- From: Jeremy Orlow <jorlow@chromium.org>
- Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 11:44:25 -0800
- To: Hans Wennborg <hans@chromium.org>
- Cc: public-webapps@w3.org
- Message-ID: <AANLkTin-rJ5GXebDcpUJonGAnCG0uvQAgAp2sYkzZWT3@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 10:07 AM, Hans Wennborg <hans@chromium.org> wrote: > For cursors on object stores, we disallow updates that change the key: > one cannot provide an explicit key, and for object stores with a key > path, the spec says that "If the effective object store of this cursor > uses in-line keys and evaluating the key path of the value parameter > results in a different value than the cursor's effective key, this > method throws DATA_ERR." > > I suppose the reason is that an implementation may have trouble > handling such updates, i.e. changing the keys that the cursor iterates > over during the iteration is a bad idea. > > A similar situation can occur with cursors over indexes: > > Say that there is an object store with objects like {fname: 'John', > lname: 'Doe', phone: 1234}, and an index with 'fname' as key path. > When iterating over the index with a cursor, should it be allowed to > update the objects so that the key in the index, in this case the > 'fname', of an object is changed? The situation seems analogous to the > one above, but as far as I can see, the spec does not mention this. > Should it be allowed? > > I would be interested to hear your thoughts on this. > I think we should remove the original limitation instead. While a cursor is happening, anyone can call .remove() and .put() which is essentially the same as doing an .update() which changes a key. So implementations will already need to handle this case one way or another. What's there seems like a fairly artificial limitation. J
Received on Tuesday, 1 February 2011 19:45:17 UTC