- From: Travis Leithead <travil@microsoft.com>
- Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 05:45:10 +0000
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- CC: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, Adrian Bateman <adrianba@microsoft.com>
Thanks for your response Ian. I also appreciate your quick response to the bug; I believe I can resolve it now :-) -----Original Message----- From: Ian Hickson [mailto:ian@hixie.ch] Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 4:44 PM To: Travis Leithead Cc: public-webapps; Adrian Bateman Subject: Re: [Web Workers] Bug filed and general question On Fri, 21 Jan 2011, Travis Leithead wrote: > > Is this the right list to comment about the web workers specification? This list or the WHATWG list, yes. > I filed a bug: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11827 and Thanks. I've commented on the bug. > am also interested in participating (or forming?) a regular meeting > time to discuss this spec If anyone wants to discuss things at a particular time, they are welcome to do so. :-) If you would like to discuss them with me, I'm happy to do it by e-mail or on IRC. I'm always in #webapps on W3net and #whatwg on Freenode. Also, if there's an IE-specific channel I could join, let me know; I'm in #webkit, #chromium, and Mozilla's #developers, but I couldn't find an IRC channel where the IE devs hang out. :-( > it's status Stable. The plan is to add cross-domain stuff to shared workers later this year, if implementations catch up with the current spec. > and path to REC. It seems to be at LCWD, but is "blocked by workload of > HTML5 editor"??: http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/PubStatus That's resolved now; Tab has volunteered to do the W3C pubrules stuff. As far as I'm concerned the spec can go to REC whenever. > Also, have any tests been submitted for this spec yet? I'm not aware of a test suite currently. HTH, -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Sunday, 23 January 2011 05:45:47 UTC