- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 08:40:21 +0100
- To: "Cameron McCormack" <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Cc: "Simon Pieters" <simonp@opera.com>, "Arun Ranganathan" <arun@mozilla.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Wed, 09 Mar 2011 22:10:00 +0100, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> wrote: > Anne van Kesteren: >> I think the construct of a parametrized type makes a lot of sense. >> But it should work like the types we have to date, so that NodeList, >> StyleSheetList, CSSRuleList, etc. can actually be defined (and >> implemented) as one. Introducing a completely new type with different >> behavior is not worth it. > > It might be worth introducing parameterized interface types in Web IDL > in the future, but given the number of edits that need doing and > outstanding issues to resolve, and the desire to get it stable quickly, > it sounds like a V2 feature. Lets at least remove sequence<T> from the draft then. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Thursday, 10 March 2011 08:13:37 UTC