Re: [IndexedDB] setVersion blocked on uncollected garbage IDBDatabases

On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 2:45 AM, Joćo Eiras <joao.eiras@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> The only solution I can think of is to require (or recommend) that
>>> implementations run the garbage collector in a context after firing
>>> the "versionchange" event if the database still isn't closed. This
>>> should be a rare occurrence simply because setVersion should be rare.
>>
>> That would be a hack in the implementation and a hack in the spec.
>
> Why? And what are you suggesting instead?

Don't have a solution, but expecting certain GC behavior on a
specification is far from sane.

Received on Tuesday, 8 February 2011 11:21:15 UTC