On Thu, 24 Feb 2011, Arthur Barstow wrote: > > Given the information below, I think it would be useful to move this > spec to a "test-ready" state. That is, publish it as a Last Call Working > Draft now and if there are known issues, document them in the Status of > the Document Section. Then, after a fixed review period, if no > substantial changes are agreed, the spec can be moved to Candidate > Recommendation and work on a test suite can begin. Naturally, if major > changes are agreed, the spec will need to return to Working Draft. On Thu, 24 Feb 2011, Arthur Barstow wrote: > Given the information below, I think it would be useful to move this > spec to a "test-ready" state. That is, publish it as a Last Call Working > Draft now and if there are known issues, document them in the Status of > the Document Section. Then, after a fixed review period, if no > substantial changes are agreed, the spec can be moved to Candidate > Recommendation and work on a test suite can begin. Naturally, if major > changes are agreed, the spec will need to return to Working Draft. I'll defer to Tab for these. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'Received on Friday, 25 February 2011 01:47:08 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:13:16 UTC