Re: [chromium-html5] LocalStorage inside Worker

On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 6:06 PM, Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com> wrote:
> Shouldn't sessionStorage be made accessible?
>
> I don't think localStorage should be (to web workers), but sessionStorage
> seems
> a reasonable request.

Why?  I've wanted to access localStorage from workers in the past, and
if the details for accessing Storage objects are worked out at all,
then exposing sessionStorage but not localStorage seems arbitrary and
unnecessarily restrictive.

-- 
Glenn Maynard