On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 6:06 PM, Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com> wrote: > Shouldn't sessionStorage be made accessible? > > I don't think localStorage should be (to web workers), but sessionStorage > seems > a reasonable request. Why? I've wanted to access localStorage from workers in the past, and if the details for accessing Storage objects are worked out at all, then exposing sessionStorage but not localStorage seems arbitrary and unnecessarily restrictive. -- Glenn MaynardReceived on Friday, 7 January 2011 00:23:44 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:13:15 UTC