On Sat, 12 Feb 2011, Arthur Barstow wrote: > > What high priority work must be done such that this spec is ready to be > re-published as a new Last Call Working draft? Tab, do you know of anything that is blocking redoing an LC? (Personally I'm fine with it going to REC yesterday, so...) > Bugzilla shows no open bugs for this spec [Bugs] and the latest ED includes > the following: > > [[ > The use of the storage mutex to avoid race conditions is currently considered > by certain implementors to be too high a performance burden, to the point > where allowing data corruption is considered preferable. Alternatives that do > not require a user-agent-wide per-origin script lock are eagerly sought after. > If reviewers have any suggestions, they are urged to send them to the > addresses given in the previous section. [...] > ]] > > In particular, what are the proposals, plans and timeline to address the > above issues? There is no proposal to address the issue. The plan is to wait for someone to have an idea. The timeline is thus open-ended. HTH, -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'Received on Monday, 14 February 2011 10:13:50 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:13:16 UTC