ietf-http-wg@w3.org from April to June 2009 by author

=JeffH

• Re: PROPOSAL: content sniffing [#155] (Thursday, 9 April)
• Re: PROPOSAL: content sniffing [#155] (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: PROPOSAL: content sniffing [#155] (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing (Tuesday, 7 April)

Adam Barth

• The HTTP Sec-From Header (draft-abarth-origin) (Sunday, 28 June)
• Re: The HTTP Origin Header (draft-abarth-origin) (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: The HTTP Origin Header (draft-abarth-origin) (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: The HTTP Origin Header (draft-abarth-origin) (Wednesday, 24 June)
• Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing (Monday, 22 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Thursday, 18 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Thursday, 18 June)
• Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Tuesday, 16 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Sunday, 14 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Saturday, 13 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Saturday, 13 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Saturday, 13 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Saturday, 13 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Saturday, 13 June)
• Re: PROPOSAL: Sending Referer [#144] (Friday, 12 June)
• Re: Sending Referer [#144] (Friday, 12 June)
• Re: Sending Referer [#144] (Friday, 12 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Friday, 12 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Saturday, 6 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Saturday, 6 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Friday, 5 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Friday, 5 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Friday, 5 June)
• Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing (Friday, 5 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Friday, 5 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Friday, 5 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Friday, 5 June)
• Re: allowing sniffed type list to be extensible? No. (Friday, 5 June)
• Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing (Friday, 5 June)
• Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing (Friday, 5 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Thursday, 4 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Thursday, 4 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Tuesday, 2 June)
• Re: Sending Referer [#144] (Monday, 1 June)
• Re: Sending Referer [#144] (Monday, 1 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Monday, 1 June)
• Re: Sending Referer [#144] (Monday, 1 June)
• Re: Sending Referer [#144] (Monday, 1 June)
• Re: allowing sniffed type list to be extensible? No. (Sunday, 31 May)
• Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing (Sunday, 31 May)
• Re: Questions about draft-abarth-mime-sniff-00 (Saturday, 30 May)
• Re: Questions about draft-abarth-mime-sniff-00 (Saturday, 30 May)
• Re: Questions about draft-abarth-mime-sniff-00 (Saturday, 30 May)
• Re: Questions about draft-abarth-mime-sniff-00 (Saturday, 30 May)
• Re: CONNECT command with message body (Monday, 18 May)
• Re: PROPOSAL: content sniffing [#155] (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: PROPOSAL: content sniffing [#155] (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: PROPOSAL: content sniffing [#155] (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: PROPOSAL: content sniffing [#155] (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: PROPOSAL: content sniffing [#155] (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: content sniffing (and HTTP profiling) (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: content sniffing (and HTTP profiling) (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: content sniffing (and HTTP profiling) (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: content sniffing (and HTTP profiling) (Tuesday, 7 April)
• Re: Questions about draft-abarth-mime-sniff-00 (Tuesday, 7 April)
• Re: Questions about draft-abarth-mime-sniff-00 (Tuesday, 7 April)
• Re: Questions about draft-abarth-mime-sniff-00 (Tuesday, 7 April)
• Re: Questions about draft-abarth-mime-sniff-00 (Tuesday, 7 April)
• Re: Questions about draft-abarth-mime-sniff-00 (Monday, 6 April)
• Re: Questions about draft-abarth-mime-sniff-00 (Monday, 6 April)
• Re: Questions about draft-abarth-mime-sniff-00 (Monday, 6 April)
• Re: Questions about draft-abarth-mime-sniff-00 (Monday, 6 April)
• Re: Questions about draft-abarth-mime-sniff-00 (Monday, 6 April)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing (Friday, 3 April)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing (Friday, 3 April)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing (Thursday, 2 April)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing (Thursday, 2 April)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing (Wednesday, 1 April)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing (Wednesday, 1 April)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing (Wednesday, 1 April)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing (Wednesday, 1 April)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing (Wednesday, 1 April)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing (Wednesday, 1 April)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing (Wednesday, 1 April)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing (Wednesday, 1 April)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing (Wednesday, 1 April)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing (Wednesday, 1 April)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing (Wednesday, 1 April)

Adrian Chadd

• Re: querystring part of cache key (Friday, 22 May)
• Re: querystring part of cache key (Friday, 22 May)

Adrien de Croy

• Re: httpbis-p6-cache-06 and no-store response directive (Monday, 29 June)
• 304 reponse with unrecognised ETag (Friday, 19 June)
• Re: httpbis-p6-cache-06 and no-store response directive (Thursday, 18 June)
• Re: httpbis-p6-cache-06 and no-store response directive (Thursday, 18 June)
• Re: HTTP/1.1 CONNECT request without Host header (Wednesday, 17 June)
• chunking without chunking (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: HTTP/1.1 CONNECT request without Host header (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: HTTP/1.1 CONNECT request without Host header (Wednesday, 17 June)
• HTTP/1.1 CONNECT request without Host header (Tuesday, 16 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Sunday, 14 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Sunday, 14 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Sunday, 14 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Saturday, 13 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Saturday, 13 June)
• non CHAR characters in headers (Friday, 12 June)
• Re: Proposal: 205 Bodies [#88] (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: Proposal: 205 Bodies [#88] (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: Proposal: 205 Bodies [#88] (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: Proposal: 205 Bodies [#88] (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: httpbis-p6-cache-06 and no-store response directive (Monday, 8 June)
• updating headers with 304 responses (Friday, 5 June)
• Vary: Cookie (Wednesday, 3 June)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-06 (Wednesday, 3 June)
• Re: absolute URI in request to origin servers which are also proxies. (Tuesday, 2 June)
• Re: absolute URI in request to origin servers which are also proxies. (Tuesday, 2 June)
• absolute URI in request to origin servers which are also proxies. (Tuesday, 2 June)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-06 (Wednesday, 27 May)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-06 (Wednesday, 27 May)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-06 (Wednesday, 27 May)
• Re: relative weights of different Accept-* headers in content negotiation (Wednesday, 27 May)
• Re: relative weights of different Accept-* headers in content negotiation (Wednesday, 27 May)
• relative weights of different Accept-* headers in content negotiation (Wednesday, 27 May)
• draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-06 (Tuesday, 26 May)
• Re: BNF for Cache-Control (Monday, 25 May)
• Re: BNF for Cache-Control (Monday, 25 May)
• Re: BNF for Cache-Control (Monday, 25 May)
• BNF for Cache-Control (Sunday, 24 May)
• Re: querystring part of cache key (Saturday, 23 May)
• querystring part of cache key (Friday, 22 May)
• Re: 12.2. Agent-driven negotiation (Friday, 22 May)
• 12.2. Agent-driven negotiation (Thursday, 21 May)
• Re: CONNECT command with message body (Monday, 18 May)
• Re: CONNECT command with message body (Monday, 18 May)
• Re: CONNECT command with message body (Monday, 18 May)
• Re: CONNECT command with message body (Monday, 18 May)
• Re: i37: Vary and non-existant headers (Friday, 8 May)
• Re: i37: Vary and non-existant headers (Thursday, 7 May)
• Re: CONNECT command with message body (Tuesday, 5 May)
• Re: CONNECT command with message body (Tuesday, 5 May)
• Re: CONNECT command with message body (Tuesday, 5 May)
• CONNECT command with message body (Tuesday, 5 May)
• Re: PROPOSAL: content sniffing [#155] (Thursday, 9 April)
• Re: PROPOSAL: content sniffing [#155] (Thursday, 9 April)
• Re: Questions about draft-abarth-mime-sniff-00 (Monday, 6 April)
• Re: Questions about draft-abarth-mime-sniff-00 (Monday, 6 April)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing (Friday, 3 April)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing (Wednesday, 1 April)

Alexey Melnikov

• Re: Issue 170, was: IANA Registration Requirements for Status Codes and Method Names (Thursday, 4 June)
• URI/IRI revisions (was Re: Minutes from informal IETF/W3C meeting about HTML5 work) (Friday, 17 April)
• Re: Minutes from informal IETF/W3C meeting about HTML5 work (Friday, 17 April)

Amit Klein

• HTTP pipelining - indirect security implications (Thursday, 2 April)

Anne van Kesteren

• Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing (Tuesday, 16 June)
• Re: Review Comments for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-05 (Friday, 17 April)
• Re: URI handling for Location (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: URI handling for Location (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: URI handling for Location (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: URI handling for Location (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: [link draft] Changing the model for links (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: [link draft] Changing the model for links (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: [link draft] Changing the model for links (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: [link draft] Changing the model for links (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: URI handling for Location (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: URI handling for Location (Tuesday, 7 April)
• Re: URI handling for Location (Tuesday, 7 April)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: Drop Content-Location (Tuesday, 7 April)
• Re: Questions about draft-abarth-mime-sniff-00 (Monday, 6 April)
• Re: Questions about draft-abarth-mime-sniff-00 (Monday, 6 April)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing (Thursday, 2 April)

Barry Leiba

• Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing (Wednesday, 1 April)

Bil Corry

• Re: httpbis-p6-cache-06 and no-store response directive (Wednesday, 24 June)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing (Wednesday, 1 April)

Bill McQuillan

• Re: Questions about draft-abarth-mime-sniff-00 (Tuesday, 7 April)

Bjoern Hoehrmann

• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Thursday, 18 June)
• CR and LF in chunk extension values (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Tuesday, 16 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Sunday, 14 June)
• Re: HTTP Batch Request Draft (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Friday, 5 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Friday, 5 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Friday, 5 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Tuesday, 2 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Tuesday, 2 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Monday, 1 June)
• Re: Use of extension-header in entity-header (Thursday, 21 May)
• Re: Use of extension-header in entity-header (Wednesday, 20 May)
• Use of extension-header in entity-header (Wednesday, 20 May)
• Re: Collected ABNF for HTTPbis (Monday, 18 May)
• Re: Collected ABNF for HTTPbis (Monday, 18 May)
• Re: nested comments [was: Ticket 162, was: Ambiguity in ABNF for comment] (Tuesday, 5 May)
• Re: nested comments [was: Ticket 162, was: Ambiguity in ABNF for comment] (Monday, 4 May)

Blake Frantz

• RE: Questions about draft-abarth-mime-sniff-00 (Tuesday, 7 April)

Boris Zbarsky

• Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing (Tuesday, 30 June)
• Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing (Tuesday, 30 June)
• Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing (Friday, 19 June)
• Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing (Friday, 19 June)
• Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing (Friday, 19 June)
• Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing (Monday, 8 June)

Brian Smith

• RE: draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-06 (Tuesday, 2 June)
• RE: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Monday, 1 June)
• RE: Sending Referer [#144] (Monday, 1 June)
• RE: draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-06 (Wednesday, 27 May)
• RE: Cache-Control private="...", no-cache="..." (was RE: draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-06) (Wednesday, 27 May)
• RE: draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-06 (Wednesday, 27 May)
• RE: draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-06 (Wednesday, 27 May)
• Cache-Control private="...", no-cache="..." (was RE: draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-06) (Wednesday, 27 May)
• RE: draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-06 (Wednesday, 27 May)
• RE: relative weights of different Accept-* headers in content negotiation (Wednesday, 27 May)
• RE: relative weights of different Accept-* headers in content negotiation (Wednesday, 27 May)
• RE: BNF for Cache-Control (Sunday, 24 May)
• RE: Use of extension-header in entity-header (Thursday, 21 May)
• RE: Use of extension-header in entity-header (Wednesday, 20 May)
• RE: Use of extension-header in entity-header (Wednesday, 20 May)
• RE: Issue 163, was: Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates (Tuesday, 19 May)
• RE: Issue 163, was: Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates (Monday, 18 May)
• RE: Issue 163, was: Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates (Monday, 18 May)
• RE: Collected ABNF for HTTPbis (Monday, 18 May)
• RE: Issue 163, was: Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates (Monday, 18 May)
• RE: Collected ABNF for HTTPbis (Monday, 18 May)
• RE: Issue 163, was: Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates (Sunday, 17 May)
• RE: Collected ABNF for HTTPbis (Sunday, 17 May)
• RE: Issue 163, was: Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates (Monday, 11 May)
• RE: Issue 163, was: Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates (Friday, 8 May)
• RE: Issue 163, was: Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates (Friday, 8 May)
• RE: Issue 163, was: Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates (Friday, 8 May)
• RE: i37: Vary and non-existant headers (Friday, 8 May)
• RE: i37: Vary and non-existant headers (Friday, 8 May)
• RE: i37: Vary and non-existant headers (Friday, 8 May)
• RE: i37: Vary and non-existant headers (Friday, 8 May)
• RE: i37: Vary and non-existant headers (Thursday, 7 May)
• RE: i37: Vary and non-existant headers (Wednesday, 6 May)
• RE: #110: how to determine what entity a response carries (Wednesday, 6 May)
• RE: NEW ISSUE: Drop Content-Location (Wednesday, 6 May)
• RE: nested comments [was: Ticket 162, was: Ambiguity in ABNF for comment] (Tuesday, 5 May)
• RE: Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates (Sunday, 3 May)
• RE: Ticket 162, was: Ambiguity in ABNF for comment (Sunday, 3 May)
• RE: Ticket 162, was: Ambiguity in ABNF for comment (Saturday, 2 May)
• RE: Base for first-byte-pos, last-byte-pos, suffix-length (Saturday, 2 May)
• RE: Base for first-byte-pos, last-byte-pos, suffix-length (Saturday, 2 May)
• RE: Base for first-byte-pos, last-byte-pos, suffix-length (Friday, 1 May)
• RE: Base for first-byte-pos, last-byte-pos, suffix-length (Thursday, 16 April)
• RE: [i161] Base for first-byte-pos, last-byte-pos, suffix-length (Thursday, 16 April)
• RE: Base for first-byte-pos, last-byte-pos, suffix-length (Thursday, 16 April)
• RE: PROPOSAL: content sniffing [#155] (Saturday, 11 April)
• RE: PROPOSAL: content sniffing [#155] (Thursday, 9 April)
• RE: PROPOSAL: content sniffing [#155] (Thursday, 9 April)
• RE: Nit in section 2.1.1 of httpbis-p1 (Wednesday, 8 April)
• RE: NEW ISSUE: Drop Content-Location (Wednesday, 8 April)
• RE: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing (Wednesday, 8 April)
• RE: NEW ISSUE: Drop Content-Location (Wednesday, 8 April)
• RE: URI handling for Location (Wednesday, 8 April)

Dan Winship

• Re: Issue 163, was: Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates (Monday, 18 May)

Daniel Stenberg

• Re: HTTP/1.1 CONNECT request without Host header (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: HTTP Batch Request Draft (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: Issue 166: clarify term "User Agent" and resolve inconsistencies with W3C specs (Tuesday, 2 June)
• Re: Issue 166: clarify term "User Agent" and resolve inconsistencies with W3C specs (Tuesday, 2 June)
• Re: Issue 163, was: Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates (Sunday, 17 May)
• Re: CONNECT command with message body (Tuesday, 5 May)
• Re: CONNECT command with message body (Tuesday, 5 May)
• Re: CONNECT command with message body (Tuesday, 5 May)
• Re: CONNECT command with message body (Tuesday, 5 May)
• Re: URI handling for Location (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: Questions about draft-abarth-mime-sniff-00 (Monday, 6 April)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing (Thursday, 2 April)

Dave Singer

• Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing (Wednesday, 17 June)

David Morris

• Re: httpbis-p6-cache-06 and no-store response directive (Monday, 29 June)
• Re: HTTP/1.1 CONNECT request without Host header (Tuesday, 16 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Friday, 12 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Sunday, 7 June)
• Re: absolute URI in request to origin servers which are also proxies. (Tuesday, 2 June)
• Re: absolute URI in request to origin servers which are also proxies. (Tuesday, 2 June)
• Re: absolute URI in request to origin servers which are also proxies. (Tuesday, 2 June)
• RE: draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-06 (Wednesday, 27 May)
• Re: querystring part of cache key (Friday, 22 May)
• Re: Issue 163, was: Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Re: Issue 164, was: Statuscodes (Friday, 8 May)
• Re: i37: Vary and non-existant headers (Thursday, 7 May)
• Re: i37: Vary and non-existant headers (Thursday, 7 May)
• Re: nested comments [was: Ticket 162, was: Ambiguity in ABNF for comment] (Monday, 4 May)
• RE: Base for first-byte-pos, last-byte-pos, suffix-length (Friday, 1 May)
• RE: Nit in section 2.1.1 of httpbis-p1 (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: Nit in section 2.1.1 of httpbis-p1 (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: Drop Content-Location (Tuesday, 7 April)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing (Wednesday, 1 April)

David Singer

• Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing (Friday, 19 June)
• Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing (Friday, 19 June)
• Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing (Thursday, 18 June)
• Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing (Tuesday, 16 June)
• Re: iPhone streaming Internet-Draft posted (Wednesday, 13 May)

Doug Schepers

• Request for Review: Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (Friday, 3 April)

Eran Hammer-Lahav

• Re: [link draft] Changing the model for links (Thursday, 9 April)
• Re: [link draft] Changing the model for links (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: [link draft] Changing the model for links (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: [link draft] Changing the model for links (Wednesday, 8 April)

Fred Baker

• Re: HTTP over SCTP without chunked encoding (Friday, 26 June)

Geoffrey Sneddon

• Re: Issue 163, was: Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates (Friday, 8 May)
• Re: Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates (Monday, 4 May)
• Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates (Sunday, 3 May)
• Behaviour with malformed headers (Sunday, 3 May)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing (Wednesday, 1 April)

Henrik Nordstrom

• Re: httpbis-p6-cache-06 and no-store response directive (Sunday, 28 June)
• Re: httpbis-p6-cache-06 and no-store response directive (Sunday, 28 June)
• Re: httpbis-p6-cache-06 and no-store response directive (Friday, 26 June)
• Re: HTTP over SCTP without chunked encoding (Friday, 26 June)
• Re: HTTP over SCTP without chunked encoding (Friday, 26 June)
• Re: The HTTP Origin Header (draft-abarth-origin) (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: httpbis-p6-cache-06 and no-store response directive (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: HTTP over SCTP without chunked encoding (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: Review of Content-Encoding: value token (Wednesday, 24 June)
• Re: The HTTP Origin Header (draft-abarth-origin) (Wednesday, 24 June)
• Re: Proposal for i23: no-store invalidation (Wednesday, 24 June)
• Re: 304 reponse with unrecognised ETag (Wednesday, 24 June)
• Re: httpbis-p6-cache-06 and no-store response directive (Wednesday, 24 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Thursday, 18 June)
• Re: httpbis-p6-cache-06 and no-store response directive (Thursday, 18 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Thursday, 18 June)
• Re: HTTP/1.1 CONNECT request without Host header (Thursday, 18 June)
• Re: chunking without chunking (Thursday, 18 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Thursday, 18 June)
• Re: httpbis-p6-cache-06 and no-store response directive (Thursday, 18 June)
• Re: httpbis-p6-cache-06 and no-store response directive (Tuesday, 16 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Tuesday, 16 June)
• Re: Is OPTIONS Safe? (Monday, 15 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Monday, 15 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Monday, 15 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Saturday, 13 June)
• RE: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Friday, 12 June)
• Re: PROPOSAL: Sending Referer [#144] (Friday, 12 June)
• Re: Sending Referer [#144] (Friday, 12 June)
• Re: Sending Referer [#144] (Friday, 12 June)
• Re: Proposal for i23: no-store invalidation (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: Proposal: 205 Bodies [#88] (Wednesday, 10 June)
• Re: Proposal for i23: no-store invalidation (Wednesday, 10 June)
• Re: Proposal for i23: no-store invalidation (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: Proposal for i23: no-store invalidation (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: Issue 80 & 79, was: NEW ISSUE: Content-Location vs PUT/POST (Wednesday, 6 May)
• Re: Closing #90: multipart/byteranges (Tuesday, 7 April)

Ian Hickson

• Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing (Tuesday, 30 June)
• Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing (Tuesday, 30 June)
• Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing (Tuesday, 30 June)
• Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing (Tuesday, 30 June)
• Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing (Tuesday, 30 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Sunday, 14 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Sunday, 14 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Sunday, 14 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Sunday, 14 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Sunday, 14 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Sunday, 14 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Sunday, 14 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Sunday, 14 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Saturday, 13 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Saturday, 13 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Saturday, 13 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Friday, 12 June)
• Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing (Friday, 12 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Friday, 5 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Friday, 5 June)
• Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing (Monday, 1 June)
• Re: [link draft] Changing the model for links (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: [link draft] Changing the model for links (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: [link draft] Changing the model for links (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: content sniffing (and HTTP profiling) (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: content sniffing (and HTTP profiling) (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: Drop Content-Location (Tuesday, 7 April)
• Re: Questions about draft-abarth-mime-sniff-00 (Monday, 6 April)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing (Friday, 3 April)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing (Friday, 3 April)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing (Friday, 3 April)

Internet-Drafts@ietf.org

• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-02.txt (Thursday, 28 May)

James M Snell

• Re: HTTP Batch Request Draft (Wednesday, 10 June)
• Re: HTTP Batch Request Draft (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: HTTP Batch Request Draft (Monday, 8 June)
• HTTP Batch Request Draft (Monday, 8 June)

Jamie Lokier

• Re: httpbis-p6-cache-06 and no-store response directive (Sunday, 28 June)
• Re: httpbis-p6-cache-06 and no-store response directive (Sunday, 28 June)
• Re: httpbis-p6-cache-06 and no-store response directive (Sunday, 28 June)
• Re: CR and LF in chunk extension values (Friday, 26 June)
• Re: httpbis-p6-cache-06 and no-store response directive (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: httpbis-p6-cache-06 and no-store response directive (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: httpbis-p6-cache-06 and no-store response directive (Wednesday, 24 June)
• Re: httpbis-p6-cache-06 and no-store response directive (Wednesday, 24 June)
• Re: httpbis-p6-cache-06 and no-store response directive (Wednesday, 24 June)
• Re: httpbis-p6-cache-06 and no-store response directive (Wednesday, 24 June)
• Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing (Tuesday, 16 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Tuesday, 16 June)
• Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing (Tuesday, 16 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Tuesday, 16 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Tuesday, 16 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Sunday, 14 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Saturday, 13 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Saturday, 13 June)
• Re: Is OPTIONS Safe? (Saturday, 13 June)
• Re: httpbis-p6-cache-06 and no-store response directive (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-06 (Sunday, 7 June)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-06 (Sunday, 7 June)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-06 (Sunday, 7 June)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-06 (Sunday, 7 June)
• Re: Vary: Cookie (Wednesday, 3 June)
• Re: Vary: Cookie (Wednesday, 3 June)
• Re: querystring part of cache key (Friday, 22 May)
• Re: querystring part of cache key (Friday, 22 May)
• Re: querystring part of cache key (Friday, 22 May)
• Re: Issue 163, was: Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates (Tuesday, 19 May)
• TCP half-close behaviour (Monday, 18 May)
• Re: CONNECT command with message body (Monday, 18 May)
• Re: CONNECT command with message body (Monday, 18 May)
• Re: Issue 163, was: Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates (Sunday, 17 May)
• Re: i37: Vary and non-existant headers (Friday, 8 May)
• Re: i37: Vary and non-existant headers (Thursday, 7 May)
• Re: i37: Vary and non-existant headers (Thursday, 7 May)
• Re: CONNECT command with message body (Tuesday, 5 May)
• Re: PROPOSAL: content sniffing [#155] (Sunday, 12 April)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: isolate TCP-specific aspects of HTTP (Saturday, 4 April)
• Re: Pipelining in HTTP 1.1 (Saturday, 4 April)
• Re: Pipelining in HTTP 1.1 (Saturday, 4 April)
• Re: Pipelining in HTTP 1.1 (Wednesday, 1 April)

Jan Algermissen

• Appropriate response code if server wants to enforce conditional PUT/DELETE? (Monday, 29 June)

Javier Godoy

• Re: Proposal: 205 Bodies [#88] (Monday, 8 June)

Joe D Williams

• Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing (Monday, 22 June)
• Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing (Friday, 19 June)
• Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing (Friday, 19 June)
• Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing (Friday, 19 June)
• Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing (Wednesday, 17 June)

John Kemp

• Re: Is OPTIONS Safe? (Wednesday, 3 June)

Jonas Sicking

• Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing (Wednesday, 17 June)

Jonathan Rees

• Review of new HTTPbis text for 303 See Other (Monday, 15 June)
• Re: Review Comments for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-05 (Monday, 15 June)

Julian Reschke

• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Sunday, 14 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Sunday, 14 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Sunday, 14 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Sunday, 14 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Sunday, 14 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Sunday, 14 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Saturday, 13 June)
• Re: 10 years (Saturday, 13 June)
• #94 (Reason-Phrase BNF) (Saturday, 13 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Saturday, 13 June)
• Re: PROPOSAL: Sending Referer [#144] (Saturday, 13 June)
• Re: PATCH and ETags (Saturday, 13 June)
• Re: non CHAR characters in headers (Friday, 12 June)
• Requests that do now allow bodies (do they exist?), was: Proposal: 205 Bodies [#88] (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: Proposal: 205 Bodies [#88] (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: Proposal: 205 Bodies [#88] (Tuesday, 9 June)
• Proposed Erratum for RFC 2817, was: Issue 170, was: IANA Registration Requirements for Status Codes and Method Names (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: Proposal: 205 Bodies [#88] (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: Proposal: 205 Bodies [#88] (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: Proposal: 205 Bodies [#88] (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: Sending Referer [#144] (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: PROPOSAL: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Sunday, 7 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Sunday, 7 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Saturday, 6 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Saturday, 6 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Saturday, 6 June)
• Re: #172 (take over HTTP Upgrade Token Registry) – httpbis (Friday, 5 June)
• Re: #172 (take over HTTP Upgrade Token Registry) – httpbis (Friday, 5 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Friday, 5 June)
• Re: Issue 170, was: IANA Registration Requirements for Status Codes and Method Names (Friday, 5 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Thursday, 4 June)
• Re: Issue 170, was: IANA Registration Requirements for Status Codes and Method Names (Thursday, 4 June)
• #172 (take over HTTP Upgrade Token Registry) – httpbis (Thursday, 4 June)
• Issue 170, was: IANA Registration Requirements for Status Codes and Method Names (Wednesday, 3 June)
• IANA Registration Requirements for Status Codes and Method Names (Wednesday, 3 June)
• Re: Is OPTIONS Safe? (Wednesday, 3 June)
• Issue 166: clarify term "User Agent" and resolve inconsistencies with W3C specs (Monday, 1 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Monday, 1 June)
• Re: Sending Referer [#144] (Monday, 1 June)
• Re: BNF for Cache-Control (Monday, 25 May)
• Re: BNF for Cache-Control (Monday, 25 May)
• Re: BNF for Cache-Control (Sunday, 24 May)
• Re: Use of extension-header in entity-header (Thursday, 21 May)
• Re: Use of extension-header in entity-header (Thursday, 21 May)
• Re: 12.2. Agent-driven negotiation (Thursday, 21 May)
• Re: Issue 163, was: Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Issue 165, was: Issue 163, was: Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Re: Issue 163, was: Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates (Monday, 18 May)
• Re: Issue 163, was: Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates (Monday, 18 May)
• Collected ABNF for HTTPbis (Sunday, 17 May)
• Re: Issue 163, was: Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates (Sunday, 17 May)
• Re: Issue 163, was: Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates (Monday, 11 May)
• Re: Issue 163, was: Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates (Monday, 11 May)
• Re: Issue 163, was: Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates (Sunday, 10 May)
• Re: Issue 164, was: Statuscodes (Saturday, 9 May)
• Re: Issue 163, was: Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates (Friday, 8 May)
• Re: Issue 163, was: Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates (Friday, 8 May)
• Re: Issue 163, was: Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates (Friday, 8 May)
• Issue 164, was: Statuscodes (Friday, 8 May)
• Re: Issue 163, was: Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates (Friday, 8 May)
• Re: i37: Vary and non-existant headers (Friday, 8 May)
• Re: i37: Vary and non-existant headers (Thursday, 7 May)
• Re: i37: Vary and non-existant headers (Thursday, 7 May)
• Issue 163, was: Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates (Thursday, 7 May)
• Re: i37: Vary and non-existant headers (Thursday, 7 May)
• Re: Issue 80, was: NEW ISSUE: Content-Location vs PUT/POST (Thursday, 7 May)
• Re: #110: how to determine what entity a response carries (Wednesday, 6 May)
• Re: i37: Vary and non-existant headers (Wednesday, 6 May)
• Re: Issue 161, was: Base for first-byte-pos, last-byte-pos, suffix-length (Wednesday, 6 May)
• Re: Issue 161, was: Base for first-byte-pos, last-byte-pos, suffix-length (Wednesday, 6 May)
• Re: Issue 80, was: NEW ISSUE: Content-Location vs PUT/POST (Wednesday, 6 May)
• Re: i37: Vary and non-existant headers (Wednesday, 6 May)
• Re: nested comments [was: Ticket 162, was: Ambiguity in ABNF for comment] (Tuesday, 5 May)
• Re: CONNECT command with message body (Tuesday, 5 May)
• Re: Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates (Monday, 4 May)
• Re: Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates (Sunday, 3 May)
• Re: Behaviour with malformed headers (Sunday, 3 May)
• Re: Ticket 162, was: Ambiguity in ABNF for comment (Sunday, 3 May)
• Re: Ticket 162, was: Ambiguity in ABNF for comment (Sunday, 3 May)
• Re: Ticket 162, was: Ambiguity in ABNF for comment (Saturday, 2 May)
• Issue 161, was: Base for first-byte-pos, last-byte-pos, suffix-length (Saturday, 2 May)
• Re: Ticket 162, was: Ambiguity in ABNF for comment (Saturday, 2 May)
• Re: Base for first-byte-pos, last-byte-pos, suffix-length (Friday, 1 May)
• Re: Ticket 162, was: Ambiguity in ABNF for comment (Friday, 1 May)
• Re: Base for first-byte-pos, last-byte-pos, suffix-length (Friday, 1 May)
• Ticket 162, was: Ambiguity in ABNF for comment (Thursday, 30 April)
• Re: [rest-discuss] mnot on HTTPbis (Wednesday, 22 April)
• Re: Review Comments for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-05 (Friday, 17 April)
• Re: Review Comments for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-05 (Friday, 17 April)
• Re: Review Comments for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-05 (Friday, 17 April)
• Re: Review Comments for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-05 (Friday, 17 April)
• Re: Review Comments for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-05 (Friday, 17 April)
• Re: Review Comments for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-05 (Friday, 17 April)
• Re: Review Comments for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-05 (Friday, 17 April)
• Re: Review Comments for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-05 (Friday, 17 April)
• Re: Review Comments for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-05 (Friday, 17 April)
• Re: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-link-header-05.txt (Friday, 17 April)
• Re: Fwd: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-link-header-05.txt (Friday, 17 April)
• Re: Base for first-byte-pos, last-byte-pos, suffix-length (Friday, 17 April)
• Re: Base for first-byte-pos, last-byte-pos, suffix-length (Thursday, 16 April)
• Re: PROPOSAL: content sniffing [#155] (Thursday, 9 April)
• Re: PROPOSAL: content sniffing [#155] (Thursday, 9 April)
• Re: PROPOSAL: content sniffing [#155] (Thursday, 9 April)
• Re: PROPOSAL: content sniffing [#155] (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: PATCH draft (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: Users with different access rights in HTTP Authentication (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: [link draft] Changing the model for links (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: URI handling for Location (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: URI handling for Location (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: URI handling for Location (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: [link draft] Changing the model for links (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: Questions about draft-abarth-mime-sniff-00 (Tuesday, 7 April)
• Re: Questions about draft-abarth-mime-sniff-00 (Tuesday, 7 April)
• Re: Questions about draft-abarth-mime-sniff-00 (Tuesday, 7 April)
• Issue 153, was: case-sensitivity of weakness indicator (Friday, 3 April)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing (Friday, 3 April)
• Re: case-sensitivity of weakness indicator (Thursday, 2 April)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing (Wednesday, 1 April)

Larry Masinter

• allowing sniffed type list to be extensible? No. (Sunday, 31 May)
• RE: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing (Sunday, 31 May)

leighton@mail.eecis.udel.edu

• Re: HTTP over SCTP without chunked encoding (Thursday, 25 June)
• HTTP over SCTP without chunked encoding (Thursday, 2 April)

Lisa Dusseault

• Re: Questions about draft-abarth-mime-sniff-00 (Monday, 6 April)
• Questions about draft-abarth-mime-sniff-00 (Monday, 6 April)

Maciej Stachowiak

• Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing (Wednesday, 17 June)

Mark Baker

• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Thursday, 4 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Wednesday, 3 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Tuesday, 2 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Monday, 1 June)
• Re: Nit in section 2.1.1 of httpbis-p1 (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing (Thursday, 2 April)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing (Wednesday, 1 April)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing (Wednesday, 1 April)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing (Wednesday, 1 April)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing (Wednesday, 1 April)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing (Wednesday, 1 April)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing (Wednesday, 1 April)

Mark Nottingham

• Re: Content-MD5 and partial responses (Tuesday, 30 June)
• Content-MD5 and partial responses (Monday, 29 June)
• Re: httpbis-p6-cache-06 and no-store response directive (Friday, 26 June)
• Fwd: Questions (errata?) about caching authenticated responses [#174] (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: i37: Vary and non-existant headers (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: The HTTP Origin Header (draft-abarth-origin) (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: CR and LF in chunk extension values (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: httpbis-p6-cache-06 and no-store response directive (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: The HTTP Origin Header (draft-abarth-origin) (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: PROPOSAL: Sending Referer [#144] (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: RED: a tool for examining HTTP resources (Thursday, 25 June)
• RED: a tool for examining HTTP resources (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: The HTTP Origin Header (draft-abarth-origin) (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: httpbis-p6-cache-06 and no-store response directive (Thursday, 25 June)
• FYI: Stockholm meeting slot (Sunday, 21 June)
• Re: httpbis-p6-cache-06 and no-store response directive (Thursday, 18 June)
• Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: chunking without chunking (MSIE8 and Chrome issues?) (Wednesday, 17 June)
• FYI: HTTPbis Tweets (Tuesday, 16 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Sunday, 14 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Sunday, 14 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Sunday, 14 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Saturday, 13 June)
• 10 years (Saturday, 13 June)
• Re: Proposal: Is OPTIONS Safe? [#171] (Saturday, 13 June)
• Re: HTTP Batch Request Draft (Friday, 12 June)
• PROPOSAL: Sending Referer [#144] (Friday, 12 June)
• Re: PROPOSAL: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Friday, 12 June)
• Re: Proposal: 205 Bodies [#88] (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: Proposal for i23: no-store invalidation (Wednesday, 10 June)
• Re: Proposal for i23: no-store invalidation (Tuesday, 9 June)
• Re: Proposed Erratum for RFC 2817, was: Issue 170, was: IANA Registration Requirements for Status Codes and Method Names (Tuesday, 9 June)
• Revised: Upcoming meetings (Stockholm and Hiroshima) (Tuesday, 9 June)
• Re: Proposal: 205 Bodies [#88] (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: Proposal for i23: no-store invalidation (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: Proposal: 205 Bodies [#88] (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: Proposal: 205 Bodies [#88] (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: Proposal: 205 Bodies [#88] (Monday, 8 June)
• Proposal: 205 Bodies [#88] (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: httpbis-p6-cache-06 and no-store response directive (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-06 (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-06 (Sunday, 7 June)
• Re: Sending Referer [#144] (Sunday, 7 June)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-06 (Sunday, 7 June)
• Re: #172 (take over HTTP Upgrade Token Registry) – httpbis (Sunday, 7 June)
• PROPOSAL: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Sunday, 7 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Sunday, 7 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Saturday, 6 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Saturday, 6 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Saturday, 6 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Friday, 5 June)
• Proposal: Is OPTIONS Safe? [#171] (Friday, 5 June)
• Re: Issue 170, was: IANA Registration Requirements for Status Codes and Method Names (Friday, 5 June)
• Re: #172 (take over HTTP Upgrade Token Registry) – httpbis (Friday, 5 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Friday, 5 June)
• Re: i37: Vary and non-existant headers (Thursday, 4 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Thursday, 4 June)
• Re: Is OPTIONS Safe? [#171] (Thursday, 4 June)
• Re: Issue 170, was: IANA Registration Requirements for Status Codes and Method Names (Thursday, 4 June)
• Re: IANA Registration Requirements for Status Codes and Method Names (Wednesday, 3 June)
• Re: Issue 166: clarify term "User Agent" and resolve inconsistencies with W3C specs (Wednesday, 3 June)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-06 (Wednesday, 3 June)
• Re: Vary: Cookie (Wednesday, 3 June)
• Re: Is OPTIONS Safe? (Wednesday, 3 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Wednesday, 3 June)
• Upcoming meetings (Stockholm and Hiroshima) (Wednesday, 3 June)
• Scope of redirection (Wednesday, 3 June)
• Is OPTIONS Safe? (Wednesday, 3 June)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-06 (Tuesday, 2 June)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-06 (Tuesday, 2 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Tuesday, 2 June)
• Re: Issue 166: clarify term "User Agent" and resolve inconsistencies with W3C specs (Tuesday, 2 June)
• Sending Referer [#144] (Monday, 1 June)
• Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Monday, 1 June)
• FYI: CORS review (Friday, 29 May)
• Re: i37: Vary and non-existant headers (Wednesday, 6 May)
• Re: #110: how to determine what entity a response carries (Wednesday, 6 May)
• #110: how to determine what entity a response carries (Wednesday, 6 May)
• Re: Issue 161, was: Base for first-byte-pos, last-byte-pos, suffix-length (Wednesday, 6 May)
• Re: i37: Vary and non-existant headers (Wednesday, 6 May)
• Re: Issue 80, was: NEW ISSUE: Content-Location vs PUT/POST (Wednesday, 6 May)
• Re: i37: Vary and non-existant headers (Wednesday, 6 May)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: Drop Content-Location (Wednesday, 6 May)
• Re: iPhone streaming Internet-Draft posted (Tuesday, 5 May)
• Re: nested comments [was: Ticket 162, was: Ambiguity in ABNF for comment] (Monday, 4 May)
• nested comments [was: Ticket 162, was: Ambiguity in ABNF for comment] (Monday, 4 May)
• Re: Base for first-byte-pos, last-byte-pos, suffix-length (Friday, 1 May)
• Re: Base for first-byte-pos, last-byte-pos, suffix-length (Friday, 1 May)
• Re: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-link-header-05.txt (Friday, 17 April)
• Fwd: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-link-header-05.txt (Friday, 17 April)
• Closing #85: Custom ranges (Friday, 17 April)
• Re: Base for first-byte-pos, last-byte-pos, suffix-length (Friday, 17 April)
• Re: combining authenticated and anonymous access (Thursday, 16 April)
• Re: Definition of 'resource' not consistent with RFC 3986 (Thursday, 16 April)
• Re: Base for first-byte-pos, last-byte-pos, suffix-length (Thursday, 16 April)
• Re: HTTP 301 responses for POST (Thursday, 16 April)
• Re: [link draft] Changing the model for links (Thursday, 16 April)
• Re: Retry-After header on 20X response -- HTTP/1.1 spec extension? (Wednesday, 15 April)
• Re: Empty host in 'http' scheme [#159] (Wednesday, 15 April)
• Re: PROPOSAL: content sniffing [#155] (Thursday, 9 April)
• Re: [link draft] Changing the model for links (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: PROPOSAL: content sniffing [#155] (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: [link draft] Changing the model for links (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: URI handling for Location (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: [link draft] Changing the model for links (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: [link draft] Changing the model for links (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: PROPOSAL: content sniffing [#155] (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: PROPOSAL: content sniffing [#155] (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: Users with different access rights in HTTP Authentication (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: PATCH draft (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: HTTP over SCTP without chunked encoding (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: HTTP pipelining - indirect security implications (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: PROPOSAL: content sniffing [#155] (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: Keep-alive header in RFC2616 [#158] (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: Nit in section 2.1.1 of httpbis-p1 (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: isolate TCP-specific aspects of HTTP (Wednesday, 8 April)
• PROPOSAL: content sniffing [#155] (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: content sniffing (and HTTP profiling) (Tuesday, 7 April)
• [link draft] Changing the model for links (Tuesday, 7 April)
• Draft minutes for IETF74 (Tuesday, 7 April)
• Closing #90: multipart/byteranges (Tuesday, 7 April)
• Re: URI handling for Location (Tuesday, 7 April)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: Drop Content-Location (Tuesday, 7 April)
• Closing #138: The role of Warning and Semantic Transparency in Caching (Tuesday, 7 April)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: Drop Content-Location [#154] (Tuesday, 7 April)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: Drop Content-Location (Tuesday, 7 April)
• Closing #83: OPTIONS * and proxies (Monday, 6 April)
• Closing #77: Line folding (Monday, 6 April)
• Closing #111: Use of TEXT (Monday, 6 April)
• Closing #74: Character Encodings in TEXT (Monday, 6 April)
• Closing #63: RFC2047 encoded words (Monday, 6 April)
• Closing #30: Header LWS (Monday, 6 April)
• Soliciting reviews for Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (Monday, 6 April)

Martin J. Dürst

• "Resource" in dictionaryRe: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Tuesday, 16 June)
• Re: non CHAR characters in headers (Friday, 12 June)
• OT: Re: Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates (Monday, 25 May)
• Re: Issue 163, was: Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates (Monday, 11 May)
• Re: Questions about draft-abarth-mime-sniff-00 (Tuesday, 7 April)
• Re: Questions about draft-abarth-mime-sniff-00 (Tuesday, 7 April)
• Re: Minutes from informal IETF/W3C meeting about HTML5 work (Wednesday, 1 April)

Michael Burrows

• Re: draft-nottingham-http-link-header-05: a question and an experimental implementation (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: draft-nottingham-http-link-header-05: a question and an experimental implementation (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: draft-nottingham-http-link-header-05: a question and an experimental implementation (Tuesday, 23 June)
• draft-nottingham-http-link-header-05: a question and an experimental implementation (Friday, 19 June)

Michaeljohn Clement

• Re: Questions about draft-abarth-mime-sniff-00 (Monday, 6 April)

Noah Slater

• Re: Review Comments for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-05 (Friday, 17 April)
• Re: Link Relations and languages (Thursday, 16 April)
• Link Relations and languages (Thursday, 16 April)

Pablo Castro

• PATCH and ETags (Friday, 12 June)

Patrick McManus

• Re: HTTP Batch Request Draft (Wednesday, 10 June)
• Re: HTTP Batch Request Draft (Wednesday, 10 June)
• Re: CONNECT command with message body (Tuesday, 2 June)

Phil Archer

• Re: draft-nottingham-http-link-header-05: a question and an experimental implementation (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: draft-nottingham-http-link-header-05: a question and an experimental implementation (Tuesday, 23 June)
• Re: [link draft] Changing the model for links (Thursday, 9 April)
• Re: [link draft] Changing the model for links (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: [link draft] Changing the model for links (Wednesday, 8 April)

Preethi Natarajan (prenatar)

• RE: Pipelining in HTTP 1.1 (Wednesday, 1 April)

Robert Brewer

• 408 Timeout details (Wednesday, 27 May)

Robert de Wilde

• Add: Re: How legal is this HTTP header (1.1)? (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: How legal is this HTTP header (1.1)? (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: How legal is this HTTP header (1.1)? (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: Add: How legal is this HTTP header (1.1)? (Thursday, 11 June)
• Add: How legal is this HTTP header (1.1)? (Thursday, 11 June)
• How legal is this HTTP header (1.1)? (Thursday, 11 June)

Robert O'Callahan

• Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing (Friday, 19 June)
• Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing (Friday, 19 June)
• Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing (Friday, 19 June)
• Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing (Thursday, 18 June)
• Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing (Monday, 1 June)

Roger Pantos

• iPhone streaming Internet-Draft posted (Friday, 1 May)

Roy T. Fielding

• Re: HTTP/1.1 CONNECT request without Host header (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: HTTP/1.1 CONNECT request without Host header (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: HTTP/1.1 CONNECT request without Host header (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Tuesday, 16 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Tuesday, 16 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Sunday, 14 June)
• Re: Requests that do now allow bodies (do they exist?), was: Proposal: 205 Bodies [#88] (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: Add: How legal is this HTTP header (1.1)? (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: Proposal: 205 Bodies [#88] (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: Proposal for i23: no-store invalidation (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: Proposal for i23: no-store invalidation (Tuesday, 9 June)
• Re: Proposal: 205 Bodies [#88] (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: Proposal for i23: no-store invalidation (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: Proposal: 205 Bodies [#88] (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: Proposal: 205 Bodies [#88] (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: Proposal: 205 Bodies [#88] (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: Proposal: 205 Bodies [#88] (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: Proposal: 205 Bodies [#88] (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Saturday, 6 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Saturday, 6 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Friday, 5 June)
• Re: updating headers with 304 responses (Friday, 5 June)
• Re: Issue 166: clarify term "User Agent" and resolve inconsistencies with W3C specs (Tuesday, 2 June)
• Re: i37: Vary and non-existant headers (Thursday, 7 May)
• Re: i37: Vary and non-existant headers (Thursday, 7 May)
• Re: i37: Vary and non-existant headers (Thursday, 7 May)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing (Thursday, 2 April)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing (Thursday, 2 April)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing (Wednesday, 1 April)

Salvatore Loreto

• Fwd: [hybi] draft-loreto-http-bidirectional (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: Pipelining in HTTP 1.1 (Sunday, 5 April)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: isolate TCP-specific aspects of HTTP (Wednesday, 1 April)

Sean B. Palmer

• Re: Review Comments for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-05 (Monday, 15 June)
• Re: Review Comments for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-05 (Friday, 17 April)
• Re: Review Comments for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-05 (Friday, 17 April)
• Re: Review Comments for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-05 (Friday, 17 April)
• Re: Review Comments for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-05 (Friday, 17 April)
• Re: Review Comments for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-05 (Friday, 17 April)
• Re: Review Comments for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-05 (Friday, 17 April)
• Review Comments for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-05 (Friday, 17 April)

Shane McCarron

• Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing (Friday, 3 April)

Simon Pieters

• Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing (Monday, 15 June)

Stefan Tilkov

• Statuscodes (Friday, 8 May)

Steingruebl, Andy

• RE: Pipelining in HTTP 1.1 (Wednesday, 1 April)

Thomas Broyer

• Re: Add: How legal is this HTTP header (1.1)? (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-06 (Wednesday, 27 May)
• Re: Link Relations and languages (Thursday, 16 April)

Thomas Nordin

• Ambiguity in ABNF for comment (Thursday, 30 April)

Tyler Close

• Re: Referer URI MUST NOT include a fragment (Sunday, 5 April)

Vitaly Sharovatov

• Re: iPhone streaming Internet-Draft posted (Tuesday, 5 May)

Werner Baumann

• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Sunday, 14 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Sunday, 14 June)

wiiat@wi-consortium.org

• IAT 2009 - Call for Papers - Extended Deadline (Sunday, 12 April)

William A. Rowe, Jr.

• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Saturday, 6 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Friday, 5 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Friday, 5 June)
• Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 (Thursday, 4 June)
• MS IE protocol compatibility leads? (Tuesday, 26 May)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing (Friday, 3 April)

Yngve N. Pettersen (Developer Opera Software ASA)

• Re: httpbis-p6-cache-06 and no-store response directive (Friday, 26 June)
• Re: httpbis-p6-cache-06 and no-store response directive (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: httpbis-p6-cache-06 and no-store response directive (Wednesday, 24 June)
• httpbis-p6-cache-06 and no-store response directive (Monday, 8 June)

Yngve Nysaeter Pettersen

• Re: httpbis-p6-cache-06 and no-store response directive (Monday, 15 June)

Yves Lafon

• Re: Content-MD5 and partial responses (Tuesday, 30 June)
• Re: Content-MD5 and partial responses (Tuesday, 30 June)
• Re: Cache-Control private="...", no-cache="..." (was RE: draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-06) (Wednesday, 27 May)
• RE: i37: Vary and non-existant headers (Wednesday, 6 May)
• Re: i37: Vary and non-existant headers (Wednesday, 6 May)
• Re: PROPOSAL: content sniffing [#155] (Thursday, 9 April)
• RE: NEW ISSUE: Drop Content-Location (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: Drop Content-Location (Tuesday, 7 April)
• Re: p6-caching: commentary from -05 to -06 (Monday, 6 April)

Last message date: Tuesday, 30 June 2009 23:53:39 UTC