At 16:32 +1200 18/06/09, Robert O'Callahan wrote: >On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 7:15 PM, Maciej Stachowiak ><<mailto:mjs@apple.com>mjs@apple.com> wrote: > >On Jun 16, 2009, at 11:12 PM, Adam Barth wrote: > >I think roc was specifically referring to content for the <video> tag. >Because no such content currently exists, the legacy compatibility >requirements are much less onerous than, say, for HTML. > > >I think Dave's point was that if you support codecs and containers >in <video> that are currently supported by widely used plugins, then >you are more likely to face these legacy issues with broken MIME >types when deploying <video>. Content authors might well expect that >already published MP4 files which work in the QuickTime plugin or a >Flash-based player, should continue to work if embedded via <video>. > > >They may expect that, but breaking that expectation is less of a >problem than breaking actual existing content. sorry, you've lost me. breaking that expectation does break existing content; and I can't see how doing content sniffing breaks more content than not. can you explain? -- David Singer Multimedia Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Thursday, 18 June 2009 19:06:58 UTC