- From: Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 22:48:24 -0700
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, "=JeffH" <Jeff.Hodges@kingsmountain.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Chris Wilson <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com>, Eric Lawrence <ericlaw@exchange.microsoft.com>
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 10:47 PM, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote: > On Tue, 7 Apr 2009, Adam Barth wrote: >> > >> > To be precise, they allow servers to opt out of content sniffing in >> > certain specific cases. It doesn't affect, for instance, how the >> > Content-Type header is treated for images (e.g. an image/png image >> > sent as image/gif is still treated as a PNG, even with this header >> > set, if I'm not mistaken; >> >> IE8 has a more awesome implementation than Chrome. In IE8, these images >> won't render > > Even in <img> elements? I think so. /me goes and makes a test case. Adam
Received on Wednesday, 8 April 2009 05:49:16 UTC