On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 12:06 AM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > Yep. The point I'm making is that because there isn't a RFC2119 requirement > there currently, conforming implementations are fine; adding a new one just > adds complexity... Ok. Thanks for the crash course in reading these specs. :) AdamReceived on Wednesday, 8 April 2009 07:10:06 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:19 UTC