Re: PROPOSAL: content sniffing [#155]

On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 12:06 AM, Mark Nottingham <> wrote:
> Yep. The point I'm making is that because there isn't a RFC2119 requirement
> there currently, conforming implementations are fine; adding a new one just
> adds complexity...

Ok.  Thanks for the crash course in reading these specs.  :)


Received on Wednesday, 8 April 2009 07:10:06 UTC