- From: Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>
- Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 00:09:15 -0700
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: Mark Baker <mark@coactus.com>, "=JeffH" <Jeff.Hodges@kingsmountain.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 12:06 AM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > Yep. The point I'm making is that because there isn't a RFC2119 requirement > there currently, conforming implementations are fine; adding a new one just > adds complexity... Ok. Thanks for the crash course in reading these specs. :) Adam
Received on Wednesday, 8 April 2009 07:10:06 UTC