- From: Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se>
- Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 11:51:51 +0200 (CEST)
- To: Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com>
- cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Tue, 5 May 2009, Adrien de Croy wrote: > Another point is that the CONNECT command has been around much longer than > RFC2817. Even longer than RFC2616, in which the method name was reserved. > It's a highly important and heavily used method, probably 2nd after GET for > most web browsers configured to use a proxy. Maybe even more used than GET > if you count the spammers. It therefore deserves a decent spec which covers > the basics like message bodies. Oh yes, I remember having to base all my initial CONNECT work on the early draft-luotonen-web-proxy-tunneling draft. > I'm coming to the conclusion that message bodies on CONNECT are de-facto > illegal though which helps my client with the blu-ray player. I agree with this conclusion. -- / daniel.haxx.se
Received on Tuesday, 5 May 2009 09:51:28 UTC