Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155

On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 3:13 AM, Bjoern Hoehrmann<derhoermi@gmx.net> wrote:
> I was referring to draft-abarth-mime-sniff-01, not any of the httpbis
> drafts. In the former there is for example "The user agent MAY wait for
> 512 or more bytes of the resource to be available." That could be 512
> bytes before removing chunked transfer encoding, all transfer encodings,
> the content encoding, etc. depending on which byte stream one believes
> "resource" (or "representation" per Mark's suggestion) refers to.

The intent is after transfer and content encodings are removed.
What's the correct way to refer to those bytes?

Adam