Re: Issue 80, was: NEW ISSUE: Content-Location vs PUT/POST

Mark Nottingham wrote:
> So, to summarise, it seems like we have agreement here that removing  
> "PUT and POST" from the sentence, making it:
> 
> "The meaning of the Content-Location header in requests is undefined; 
> servers are free to ignore it in those cases."
> 
> It seems like there may be a bit of alignment needed, depending on how 
> <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/79> goes...

Agreed.

Proposed patch in 
<http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/attachment/ticket/80/80.diff>.

BR, Julian