- From: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>
- Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2009 08:03:58 +0200
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Roy Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>, Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
None here. tis 2009-04-07 klockan 14:56 +1000 skrev Mark Nottingham: > Haven't seen discussion on this for a while, seems like consensus is > to drop multipart/byteranges as a delimiter. Any objection to that? > > > On 12/12/2008, at 4:17 AM, Jamie Lokier wrote: > > > > > Henrik Nordstrom wrote: > >>> They aren't used that way. I don't know of any implementation > >>> that uses the multipart delimiter to find the end of body (they > >>> use CL, chunked, or a closed connection). > >> > >> Hmm.. you may be right. On a closer inspection I see that I misread > >> some > >> of the data. Sorry for the confusion. > >> > >> So it looks like dropping 4.4 ยง4 entirely may be an option. > > > > If it's possible to drop support for multipart/byterange delimited > > messages, because it's not used anyway, that would be a really good > > thing imho. It's an ugly, pointless, unused and probably poorly > > implemented complication in message parsers. > > > > -- Jamie > > > > > -- > Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/ >
Received on Tuesday, 7 April 2009 06:04:47 UTC