- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 10:28:10 +1000
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
I think this is editorial -- any objection to that?
On 04/06/2009, at 10:45 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> while looking at IANA issues I noticed the issue below:
>
> Currently the registry prodecure for HTTP Upgrade Tokens is defined
> in RFC 2817 ("Upgrading to TLS Within HTTP/1.1"), Section 7.2 (<http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2817#section-7.2
> >). This probably should be taken over by Part 1, just as we did
> with the HTTP status code registry.
>
> I have opened <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/
> 172> to track this.
>
> BR, Julian
>
--
Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Friday, 5 June 2009 00:28:46 UTC