Re: #172 (take over HTTP Upgrade Token Registry) – httpbis

I think this is editorial -- any objection to that?


On 04/06/2009, at 10:45 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:

> Hi,
>
> while looking at IANA issues I noticed the issue below:
>
> Currently the registry prodecure for HTTP Upgrade Tokens is defined  
> in RFC 2817 ("Upgrading to TLS Within HTTP/1.1"), Section 7.2 (<http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2817#section-7.2 
> >). This probably should be taken over by Part 1, just as we did  
> with the HTTP status code registry.
>
> I have opened <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/ 
> 172> to track this.
>
> BR, Julian
>


--
Mark Nottingham     http://www.mnot.net/

Received on Friday, 5 June 2009 00:28:46 UTC