- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2009 14:21:40 +0200
- To: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net>, "HTTP Working Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Wed, 08 Apr 2009 14:13:06 +0200, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > If the spec doesn't matter, why are you even interested in changing it? I want it to matter. > None right now. This would be quite useful. >>> So, again, this would be an incompatible change. >> To make HTTP compatible with deployed Web content and actually a >> useful spec to implement against. > > Again, we can't step out of our charter. > > What's needed is *proof* that most implementations (not only browsers!) > already do this today because they were forced by broken content to > support it. I already told you curl and wget do this and the author of curl just said on the list he does this because of broken content. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Wednesday, 8 April 2009 12:22:33 UTC