- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 16:15:51 +1000
- To: Brian Smith <brian@briansmith.org>
- Cc: "'Julian Reschke'" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, "'Henrik Nordstrom'" <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>, "'Mark Baker'" <distobj@acm.org>, "'HTTP Working Group'" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
So, to summarise, it seems like we have agreement here that removing "PUT and POST" from the sentence, making it: "The meaning of the Content-Location header in requests is undefined; servers are free to ignore it in those cases." It seems like there may be a bit of alignment needed, depending on how <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/79> goes... On 31/07/2008, at 11:36 PM, Brian Smith wrote: > Julian Reschke wrote: >> Which means: it's ok to ignore Content-Location, if you "know" it. > > I agree. Put another way, it is okay to remove or replace a Content- > * header > but you cannot ignore ones you don't understand. > > Regards, > Brian > -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Wednesday, 6 May 2009 06:16:38 UTC