Re: Issue 164, was: Statuscodes

On Fri, 8 May 2009, Julian Reschke wrote:

> Stefan Tilkov wrote:
>> Apologies if this is covered elsewhere, but
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-06#section-8 
>> says
>> "Each Status-Code is described below, _including a description of which
>> method(s)_ it can follow and any metainformation required in the response."
>> but doesn't actually name the methods.
>> ...
>
> Wishful thinking, I guess :-)
>
> See <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/164>.
>
> That being said, it's not clear to me that this is even feasible or a good 
> idea.

Seems like you can fix this by removing the "_including ... methods(s)_"
phrase. Or saying 'examples of'. I think the right place for any 
information correlating status codes with methods in a normative was is
with the method description, not the status code.