W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2009

Re: [link draft] Changing the model for links

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2009 13:26:44 +0200
To: "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: "Phil Archer" <phil@philarcher.org>, "HTTP Working Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>
Message-ID: <op.ur2feucm64w2qv@annevk-t60.oslo.opera.com>
On Wed, 08 Apr 2009 13:16:07 +0200, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> On 08/04/2009, at 9:03 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> Hmm. HTML4 doesn't even really give license to do the second form; is  
> that consistent behaviour across all browsers?

HTML4 is a very vague specification. If you read it literally "alternate  
stylesheet stylesheet" should not specify an alternate stylesheet either.  
I don't think that was the intent. Though actually, it also says 'Adding  
the keyword "alternate" to the rel attribute makes it an alternate style  
sheet:' which does not imply an order.

The behavior is consistent as far as I know.

Anne van Kesteren
Received on Wednesday, 8 April 2009 11:27:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:19 UTC