Julian Reschke wrote: > So how about: > > quoted-string = DQUOTE *( qdtext / quoted-pair ) DQUOTE > qdtext = OWS / %x21 / %x23-5B / %x5D-7E / obs-text > ; OWS / VCHAR except DQUOTE / obs-text It should be 'VCHAR except DQUOTE and "\"'. > comment = "(" *( ctext / quoted-pair / comment ) ")" > ctext = OWS / %x21-27 / %x2A-5B / %x5D-7E / obs-text > ; OWS / VCHAR except "(", ")" and "\" / obs-text It should be 'VCHAR except "(", ")", and "\"' (one more comma), based on the style used in the rest of the document. > Furthermore, am I missing something, or can't we also remove "comment" > from the right hand side of the "comment" production? IMO, nested comments are a bad idea because it makes comment (and thus Via and User-Agent) non-regular. They should be treated as obsolete (like obs-text), especially since those headers are very frequently parsed with regular expressions. - BrianReceived on Sunday, 3 May 2009 03:56:15 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:19 UTC