- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 05:16:17 +0200
- To: "Brian Smith" <brian@briansmith.org>
- Cc: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
* Brian Smith wrote: >There are only four places that allow empty lists, and they are all of the >same form as "TE": > > TE = "TE" ":" OWS TE-v > TE-v = #t-codings > >They all can be rewritten using that expansion: > > TE = "TE" ":" OWS [TE-v] > TE-v = t-codings (COMMA-ows t-codings)* > >Every other use is of the form 1#rule. I am not sure what you are trying to say here. This is a matter of empty list items, not empty lists and the difference between 0#rule and 1#rule is the difference between [ 1#rule ] and 1#rule. Your rewrite disallows constructs that are valid under RFC 2616 and the current draft for which support is required and recommended respectively. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Monday, 18 May 2009 03:16:56 UTC