- From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@creative.net.au>
- Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 00:52:18 +0800
- To: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
- Cc: Adrian Chadd <adrian@creative.net.au>, David Morris <dwm@xpasc.com>, Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Fri, May 22, 2009, Jamie Lokier wrote: > Adrian Chadd wrote: > > .. Squid just caches based on the URL (with relevant rules controlling > > whether the URL can be cached or not.) > > I think there was a time when you had to avoid '?' in a URL because > caches wouldn't cache anything with it. Heh. I think squid may still treat ?'s as uncachable for that reason. In fact, plenty of origins are returning cachable info for non-normalised query strings and this has an impact on the working size and churn of the cache. Adrian
Received on Friday, 22 May 2009 16:52:54 UTC