Mark Nottingham wrote: > I'm not crazy about this approach, but it may be workable. > ... > Based on discussion so for, here's a straw-man: > ... Sounds good to me. Proposed patch: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/attachment/ticket/144/144.diff>. Note that I replaced "request header" by "header" in the second paragraph, and that I also added the Change to "A.2. Changes from RFC 2616" as: """ Allow Referer value of "about:blank" as alternative to not specifying it. (Section 9.6) """ BR, JulianReceived on Monday, 8 June 2009 06:45:38 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:19 UTC