Re: PROPOSAL: content sniffing [#155]

Julian Reschke wrote:
 > First of all, we're only discussing Content-Type, *not* Content-Encoding
 > right?
 >
 > That being said, in the spirit of defining the meaning of the message,
 > not it's processing, how about:
 >
 > "When an entity-body is included with a message, the data type of that
 > body is declared using the header fields Content-Type and Content-Encoding."

+1

=JeffH