- From: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>
- Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 02:51:59 +0200
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
tor 2009-06-11 klockan 09:00 +1000 skrev Mark Nottingham: > ... I think this issue is related in no small way: > http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/110 Indeed, if one want to make a general blanket rule independent of method etc.. But not for a rule restricted to successful responses to GET/HEAD(/POST). > Yes; as mentioned before, the concept of "cache correctness" was > dropped from p6, Sorry, been a little too much in the shadows lately... > because it didn't add any binding requirements, and > it was fuzzy at best anyway. If you think something was lost, please > say so... Not sure anything was lost. As you say it was very fuzzy.. better make something that makes sense. > Which requirements are you referring to when you say "caching of > negotiated resources sections"? 2.6 last paragraph, about deleting obviously old cache copies. Already have a note to discuss if it's at all needed... Regards Henrik
Received on Thursday, 11 June 2009 00:52:36 UTC