On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 6:26 PM, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote: > I'd be in favour of something like, "The use of different sniffing > algorithms in different implementations creates [these sorts of > problems]. Because of that, settling on common sniffing mechanisms is > important. To that end, implementations that sniff SHOULD > [...etc...]." The explanation of why it's important may sway some > implementors, and making it a SHOULD recognizes that some will go > their own way in any case. This sounds reasonable to me. AdamReceived on Wednesday, 1 April 2009 01:36:08 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:19 UTC