- From: Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>
- Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 18:35:14 -0700
- To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
- Cc: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 6:26 PM, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote: > I'd be in favour of something like, "The use of different sniffing > algorithms in different implementations creates [these sorts of > problems]. Because of that, settling on common sniffing mechanisms is > important. To that end, implementations that sniff SHOULD > [...etc...]." The explanation of why it's important may sway some > implementors, and making it a SHOULD recognizes that some will go > their own way in any case. This sounds reasonable to me. Adam
Received on Wednesday, 1 April 2009 01:36:08 UTC