W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2009

Re: HTTP Batch Request Draft

From: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2009 15:05:34 -0700
Message-ID: <4A2D8B2E.9080608@gmail.com>
To: Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se>
CC: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>

Daniel Stenberg wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Jun 2009, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
>> I initially did not understand "Each part in the batch MUST share a 
>> common Content-Type as specified by the Multipart/Batch content types 
>> Type parameter"; later I realized what you want to say is that all 
>> the individual parts must be of the type specified in the "type" 
>> parameter. Please rephrase that. It might be a good idea to merge 
>> this with the section defining the parameter.
> Why is that header needed in the first place if it MUST be the same in 
> all the parts and it MUST be the same as is provided already?
Good point. We can likely drop the per-part Content-Types.
> And a minor note: the example request in 2.2 would look more proper in 
> my eyes if it used Content-Length: for the main POST too.
Noted and agreed.

- James
Received on Monday, 8 June 2009 22:05:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:19 UTC