- From: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2009 15:05:34 -0700
- To: Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se>
- CC: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Daniel Stenberg wrote: > On Mon, 8 Jun 2009, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > >> I initially did not understand "Each part in the batch MUST share a >> common Content-Type as specified by the Multipart/Batch content types >> Type parameter"; later I realized what you want to say is that all >> the individual parts must be of the type specified in the "type" >> parameter. Please rephrase that. It might be a good idea to merge >> this with the section defining the parameter. > > Why is that header needed in the first place if it MUST be the same in > all the parts and it MUST be the same as is provided already? > Good point. We can likely drop the per-part Content-Types. > And a minor note: the example request in 2.2 would look more proper in > my eyes if it used Content-Length: for the main POST too. > Noted and agreed. - James
Received on Monday, 8 June 2009 22:05:13 UTC