Re: HTTP Batch Request Draft

Daniel Stenberg wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Jun 2009, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
>
>> I initially did not understand "Each part in the batch MUST share a 
>> common Content-Type as specified by the Multipart/Batch content types 
>> Type parameter"; later I realized what you want to say is that all 
>> the individual parts must be of the type specified in the "type" 
>> parameter. Please rephrase that. It might be a good idea to merge 
>> this with the section defining the parameter.
>
> Why is that header needed in the first place if it MUST be the same in 
> all the parts and it MUST be the same as is provided already?
>
Good point. We can likely drop the per-part Content-Types.
> And a minor note: the example request in 2.2 would look more proper in 
> my eyes if it used Content-Length: for the main POST too.
>
Noted and agreed.

- James