This is my favorite comment in this thread, bar none! Why, oh why are you all trying so hard to continue to support broken behavior instead of slapping down the people who insist on doing it wrong? If the user agents (go Firefox!) just refused to sniff, then no one would send nonsense content. 'cause it wouldn't work. Robert O'Callahan wrote: > I should also point out that so far we have had approximately zero > complaints from authors about the fact that Firefox doesn't sniff. > > Rob > -- > "He was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our > iniquities; the punishment that brought us peace was upon him, and by > his wounds we are healed. We all, like sheep, have gone astray, each > of us has turned to his own way; and the LORD has laid on him the > iniquity of us all." [Isaiah 53:5-6] -- Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.comReceived on Wednesday, 17 June 2009 04:32:12 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:19 UTC