W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2009

Re: Issue 170, was: IANA Registration Requirements for Status Codes and Method Names

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 08:57:47 +0200
Message-ID: <4A28C1EB.9070806@gmx.de>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
CC: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>

Mark Nottingham wrote:
> OK, let's call that accepted (realising that the IESG may tell us 
> something different down the road).
> 
> Milestone set to 07, Julian.

Change applied with 
<http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/changeset/591>.

BR, Julian

Received on Friday, 5 June 2009 06:58:35 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Adrien de Croy: "updating headers with 304 responses"
Previous message: Mark Nottingham: "Proposal: Is OPTIONS Safe? [#171]"
In reply to: Mark Nottingham: "Re: Issue 170, was: IANA Registration Requirements for Status Codes and Method Names"
Next in thread: Julian Reschke: "Proposed Erratum for RFC 2817, was: Issue 170, was: IANA Registration Requirements for Status Codes and Method Names"
Reply: Julian Reschke: "Proposed Erratum for RFC 2817, was: Issue 170, was: IANA Registration Requirements for Status Codes and Method Names"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:19 UTC