Re: URI handling for Location

On Tue, 07 Apr 2009 06:18:18 +0200, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> As discussed at the bar bof/informal liaison in SF, this seems to be  
> more of a URI issue; i.e., HTML and browser vendors need a named  
> construct ("dirty URI", "hypertext reference", etc.) for what goes into  
> the process, but from an HTTP perspective, this isn't evident.
>
> AIUI the follow-up will happen on the URI mailing list.

Allowing relative URIs hardly seems a "dirty URI" issue. As for the actual  
"dirty URI" issue, that isn't solved as long as HTTP keeps insisting the  
header takes an actual URI rather than such a "dirty URI".


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/

Received on Tuesday, 7 April 2009 09:17:02 UTC