Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > Hi, > > In RFC 2616 and the current drafts the extension-header is used only > in the entity-header production, suggesting all headers not defined by > it are entity headers, which I don't think is intended. Perhaps it > should be referenced in Request and Response as alternative to entity- > header instead? > ... I think this is on purpose; Roy has pointed out frequently that HTTP/1.1 doesn't have an extension point for this. Now, should we / can we fix this? Dunno. In practice, new request/response headers are defined all the time, and people minting them just need to deal with the fact that conforming HTTP/1.1 implementations may treat them as entity headers. BR, JulianReceived on Thursday, 21 May 2009 15:15:04 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:19 UTC