- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 10:31:32 +1000
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, John Kemp <john@jkemp.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Proposal: Confirm both OPTIONS and TRACE as safe methods. Any objections? On 04/06/2009, at 3:48 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote: > No real opinion. I suppose it is safe, in the sense that it doesn't > change the state of the resource. Whether it should be automatically > redirected isn't a terribly interesting question AFAICT, so I think > it is... > > http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/171 > > > On 03/06/2009, at 3:28 PM, Julian Reschke wrote: > >> Mark Nottingham wrote: >>> Yes, that's what I'm suggesting. >>> Cheers, >> >> We already state that in Part 2, Section 10.1, but that is only the >> IANA registration (<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-06.html#rfc.section.10.1 >> >)... >> >> So yes, the method description should state that as well. >> >> What about TRACE then (which is the 4th candidate)? >> >> BR, Julian > > > -- > Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/ > > -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Friday, 5 June 2009 00:32:06 UTC