W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2009

Re: HTTP Batch Request Draft

From: Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se>
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 23:55:11 +0200 (CEST)
To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
cc: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0906082346190.11889@yvahk2.pbagnpgbe.fr>
On Mon, 8 Jun 2009, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:

> I initially did not understand "Each part in the batch MUST share a common 
> Content-Type as specified by the Multipart/Batch content types Type 
> parameter"; later I realized what you want to say is that all the individual 
> parts must be of the type specified in the "type" parameter. Please rephrase 
> that. It might be a good idea to merge this with the section defining the 
> parameter.

Why is that header needed in the first place if it MUST be the same in all the 
parts and it MUST be the same as is provided already?

And a minor note: the example request in 2.2 would look more proper in my eyes 
if it used Content-Length: for the main POST too.


  / daniel.haxx.se
Received on Monday, 8 June 2009 21:53:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:19 UTC