Re: HTTP Batch Request Draft

On Mon, 8 Jun 2009, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:

> I initially did not understand "Each part in the batch MUST share a common 
> Content-Type as specified by the Multipart/Batch content types Type 
> parameter"; later I realized what you want to say is that all the individual 
> parts must be of the type specified in the "type" parameter. Please rephrase 
> that. It might be a good idea to merge this with the section defining the 
> parameter.

Why is that header needed in the first place if it MUST be the same in all the 
parts and it MUST be the same as is provided already?

And a minor note: the example request in 2.2 would look more proper in my eyes 
if it used Content-Length: for the main POST too.



Received on Monday, 8 June 2009 21:53:56 UTC