- From: Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se>
- Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 23:55:11 +0200 (CEST)
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- cc: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Mon, 8 Jun 2009, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > I initially did not understand "Each part in the batch MUST share a common > Content-Type as specified by the Multipart/Batch content types Type > parameter"; later I realized what you want to say is that all the individual > parts must be of the type specified in the "type" parameter. Please rephrase > that. It might be a good idea to merge this with the section defining the > parameter. Why is that header needed in the first place if it MUST be the same in all the parts and it MUST be the same as is provided already? And a minor note: the example request in 2.2 would look more proper in my eyes if it used Content-Length: for the main POST too. -- / daniel.haxx.se
Received on Monday, 8 June 2009 21:53:56 UTC