On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 2:44 PM, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> wrote: > * Adam Barth wrote: >>I'd like to incorporate your feedback into the draft, but the above is >>too vague for me to act upon. Are there specific statements you'd >>like me to revise? > > A good start would be including detailed rationale for the parts that > contradict other specifications or are otherwise obscure. For which parts would you like a more detailed rationale? It's hard for me to guess which parts you think are obscure. > I would make > suggestions, but I have a hard time following the document at all; How can I make the document clearer? > to > pick one problem, section two defines an algorithm, but I could not > find how and where that algorithm is supposed to be relevant. The document defines algorithms for extracting information from the Content-Type. That algorithm, in particular, extracts the charset attribute from the Content-Type header. The algorithm is intended to be reference by other specifications, such as HTML 5, which need to determine the charset attribute of the Content-Type header is a manner compatible with existing web content. Is there some way I could change the I-D to make this more clear? I'm not trying to be obtuse. Your feedback is just not very actionable. AdamReceived on Friday, 5 June 2009 08:17:06 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:19 UTC