RE: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing

Mark Baker wrote:
> My previous suggestion is as far as I would feel comfortable going
> along these lines;

+1. There's a lot of text in RFC 2616 that are better off removed because
they don't actually help define the protocol; often these parts of the spec
just create confusion. This is a prime example.

- Brian

Received on Wednesday, 8 April 2009 07:29:07 UTC