- From: Brian Smith <brian@GOROGORO.mobi>
- Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2009 02:42:12 +0000
- To: "'HTTP Working Group'" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Mark Baker wrote: > My previous suggestion is as far as I would feel comfortable going > along these lines; > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2009AprJun/0018.html +1. There's a lot of text in RFC 2616 that are better off removed because they don't actually help define the protocol; often these parts of the spec just create confusion. This is a prime example. - Brian
Received on Wednesday, 8 April 2009 07:29:07 UTC