On Wed, 08 Apr 2009 13:52:51 +0200, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > Mark Nottingham wrote: >> ... >> Regarding relative URIs -- changing their syntax to allow relative URIs >> would be a breaking change for existing implementations, so at first >> blush it's out of scope for HTTPbis (and indeed anything but HTTP/2.0). > > ... > > Indeed. Deferring the issue to HTTP/2.0 does not solve the problem because implementations have to implement this for HTTP/1.1 (and likely earlier, haven't checked). -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/Received on Wednesday, 8 April 2009 11:55:51 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:19 UTC