- From: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>
- Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 01:10:13 +0200
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>
tis 2009-06-02 klockan 01:50 +1000 skrev Mark Nottingham: > However, in previous discussions, Adam et al indicated that it would > be interesting to require that Referer always be sent, by minting a > new value (e.g., 'null', although it will have to be something else, > since "null" is a valid partial-URI) to indicate when a Referer is not > available. Not having that discussion in front of me, but why would one want this? A non-existing Referer header means that the user agent either don't have a referer URI, or do not want to tell what it was. How is sending a "null" Referer header different from this? Regards Henrik
Received on Friday, 12 June 2009 23:10:54 UTC