PROPOSAL: Sending Referer [#144]

Objections?

On 08/06/2009, at 4:44 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:

> Mark Nottingham wrote:
>> I'm not crazy about this approach, but it may be workable.
>> ...
>> Based on discussion so for, here's a straw-man:
>> ...
>
> Sounds good to me. Proposed patch: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/attachment/ticket/144/144.diff 
> >.
>
> Note that I replaced "request header" by "header" in the second  
> paragraph, and that I also added the Change to "A.2.  Changes from  
> RFC 2616" as:
>
> """
>   Allow Referer value of "about:blank" as alternative to not  
> specifying
>   it.  (Section 9.6)
> """
>
> BR, Julian
>


--
Mark Nottingham     http://www.mnot.net/

Received on Friday, 12 June 2009 04:30:04 UTC