On Tue, 26 May 2009, Brian Smith wrote: > I thought I had an explanation of how this could be useful, but my > explanation doesn't really jive with what the spec. says. I, too, would > really like to hear somebody explain how a cache is supposed to handle > private="header1, header2" and no-cache="header1, header2". The same way you will handle "Cache-Control: no-cache, max-age=86400". It is an error case, and a good implementation will most probably choose to take the more restrictive approach (no-cache), or simply discard the response for the cache purpose (so treat it as uncachable, which is the same as no-cache, but the intent is different). Another extreme is to simply reject such responses as it is clearly an error. -- Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras. ~~YvesReceived on Wednesday, 27 May 2009 08:16:48 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:19 UTC