Re: Proposal: 205 Bodies [#88]

mån 2009-06-08 klockan 21:06 +1000 skrev Mark Nottingham:
> I.e., allow entity bodes on 205?
> *shrug* In the scheme of things, it's not that important, I suppose,  
> since they're not widely used. However, it seems you'd have the same  
> philosophical debates either way -- "what is the meaning of an entity  
> on a 205 response" vs. "what is the meaning of the entity headers on a  
> 205 response"?

Undefined, just as entities in GET request are. No big deal.


Received on Wednesday, 10 June 2009 22:26:50 UTC