W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2009

Issue 161, was: Base for first-byte-pos, last-byte-pos, suffix-length

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Sat, 02 May 2009 11:49:11 +0200
Message-ID: <49FC1717.8010505@gmx.de>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>

Mark Nottingham wrote:
> It gives me a bit of pause, but I think that's OK (as long as they're 
> all clearly defined as DIGITs).
> ...

They are.

Proposed patch: 
<http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/attachment/ticket/161/161.diff>.

BR, Julian

Received on Saturday, 2 May 2009 09:50:09 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Julian Reschke: "Re: Ticket 162, was: Ambiguity in ABNF for comment"
Previous message: Julian Reschke: "Re: Ticket 162, was: Ambiguity in ABNF for comment"
In reply to: Mark Nottingham: "Re: Base for first-byte-pos, last-byte-pos, suffix-length"
Next in thread: Julian Reschke: "Re: Issue 161, was: Base for first-byte-pos, last-byte-pos, suffix-length"
Reply: Julian Reschke: "Re: Issue 161, was: Base for first-byte-pos, last-byte-pos, suffix-length"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:19 UTC