Issue 161, was: Base for first-byte-pos, last-byte-pos, suffix-length

Mark Nottingham wrote:
> It gives me a bit of pause, but I think that's OK (as long as they're 
> all clearly defined as DIGITs).
> ...

They are.

Proposed patch: 
<http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/attachment/ticket/161/161.diff>.

BR, Julian

Received on Saturday, 2 May 2009 09:50:09 UTC