Re: Issue 80, was: NEW ISSUE: Content-Location vs PUT/POST

Julian Reschke wrote:
> Mark Nottingham wrote:
>> So, to summarise, it seems like we have agreement here that removing  
>> "PUT and POST" from the sentence, making it:
>>
>> "The meaning of the Content-Location header in requests is undefined; 
>> servers are free to ignore it in those cases."
>>
>> It seems like there may be a bit of alignment needed, depending on how 
>> <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/79> goes...
> 
> Agreed.
> 
> Proposed patch in 
> <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/attachment/ticket/80/80.diff>.

Applied with <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/changeset/577>.

BR, Julian