Re: Issue 163, was: Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates

On 8 May 2009, at 18:08, Brian Smith wrote:

> I don't get why s-Mon, s-Jan, l-Mon, etc. are named productions  
> (instead of
> unnamed alternatives like in RFC 5023), but that is not new to this  
> change.

Case sensitivity. Plain strings in ABNF are case insensitive.


--
Geoffrey Sneddon
<http://gsnedders.com/>

Received on Friday, 8 May 2009 17:25:51 UTC