Re: Issue 163, was: Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates

Sorry to be late with this comment.

On 2009/05/09 2:48, Julian Reschke wrote:
> Brian Smith wrote:

>> I meant, why not write them like this:
>>
>> day-name = %x4D.6F.6E ; "Mon", case-sensitive
>> / %x54.75.65 ; "Tue", case-sensitive
>> / %x57.65.64 ; "Wed", case-sensitive
>> / %x54.68.75 ; "Thu", case-sensitive
>> / %x46.72.69 ; "Fri", case-sensitive
>> / %x53.61.74 ; "Sat", case-sensitive
>> / %x53.75.6E ; "Sun", case-sensitive
>>
>> It's not really a big deal, but I think this way is clearer.
>
> I was going to agree, but then realized that we would loose clarity in
> the collected ABNF (which doesn't contain the comments).

That seems to be backward. Wouldn't the comments be helpful in the 
collected ABNF, too?

Regards,   Martin.

-- 
#-# Martin J. Dürst, Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University
#-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp   mailto:duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp

Received on Monday, 11 May 2009 01:52:34 UTC